Macro Management Unit
***
Title
Macro Management of Agriculture Scheme - Supplementation/Complementation of States efforts through Work Plan (Macro Management)
Centrally Sponsored Scheme
Macro Management Scheme will aim at all round development in agriculture through Work Plans prepared by States. These include :
Reflection of local needs/crop/regions specific/priorities etc.
Providing flexibility and autonomy to States;
Optimum utilization of scarce financial resource
Maximization of returns;
Removal of regional imbalances.
It has been decided to move away from schematic approach to Macro Management mode by integrating 27 Centrally Sponsored Schemes listed at Annexure I. The previous pattern of rigid uniformly structured Centrally Sponsored Schemes, permitting little or no flexibility, which resulted in large unutilized balances with States has been dispensed with. Integration of Centrally Sponsored Schemes under Macro Management approach will enhance the productivity of support programmes and accord greater flexibility to State Governments to develop and pursuer activities on the basis of regional priorities. It is, thus, a major step towards achieving decentralization in pursuance of restoring primacy of States in agricultural development planning. The Central Government will supplement/complement the State Governments’ efforts through regionally differentiated Work Plans comprising crop/area/target group specific interventions, formulated in an interactive mode and implemented in spirit of partnership with the States.
The outlay of the Work Plan would be shared by the Centre and the States in the ratio of 90:10. In the case of North Eastern States, however, the entire expenditure will be borne by the Government of India. Central assistance for Work Plans will be in the ratio of 80% by Grants and 20% by Loans.
All States/UTs
Ms. Anjali Prasad,
Joint Secretary,
Macro Management,
Department of Agriculture & Cooperation
Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi
November 2000
The Government has approved separate guidelines for implementation of the Scheme. According to these guidelines the 50% of the allocation is to be released as First Instalment to the States/UTs. The release of Second and final instalment is governed by the prescribed conditions. A copy of the guidelines is at Annexure II, III & IV.
The position regarding Budget Estimates, Revised Estimates and expenditure incurred under the scheme for the years 2000-2001 2001-2002, 2002-2003 & 2003-04 is as indicated below:
(Rs. in Crores)
|
Year |
Budget Estimate |
Revised Estimate |
Expenditure |
|
2000-01 |
490.00 |
381.88 |
381.88 |
|
2001-02 |
850.00 |
680.49 |
678.62 |
|
2002-03 |
736.86 |
597.00 |
597.59 |
|
2003-04 |
700.00 |
648.60 |
648.49 |
During the current financial year viz. 2004-05 a sum of Rs. 719.94 Crores has been provided in the Budget for implementation of the scheme. Out of 719.94 Crores, a sum of Rs. 695.00 Crores has been earmarked for release to the States/UTs. The State/UT wise allocation for 2004-05 is enclosed. Work Plans for 2004-05 in respect of most of the states have been discussed/finalized and the 1st instt. amounting to Rs. 328.74 Crores has been released (details enclosed- Annexure V) to the States/UTs
Subsidy
Subsidy is available under the Scheme on various components including agriculture implements such as Tractor, Power Tiller, Power Thrashers, Sprinklers and Plant Protection Equipments. Subsidy is also available on certified quality seeds and IPM demonstrations. Subsidy per farmer or per activity should not exceed 25% of the cost or the present subsidy level approved under 27 identified schemes, whichever is lower.
Physical Monitoring
Monitoring of the relevant component of the Macro Management Scheme is the responsibility of the concerned Subject Matter Division. The Subject Matter Divisions concerned have been requested to obtain and consolidate the information in the prescribed proforma (Annexure-VI). States are required to furnish the Utilization Certificate in the prescribed proforma (GFR-19A) (Annexure-VII).
| 1. | Assistance to Coop. Weaker Section | |
| 2. | Assistance to Women Cooperatives | |
| 3. | Non-overdue Cover Scheme | |
| 4. | Agri. Credit Stabilisation Fund | |
| 5. | Special Scheme for SC/ST | |
| 6. | Integrated Cereal Development Programmes in Rice Based Cropping System Areas | |
| 7. | Integrated Cereal Development Programmes in Wheat Based Cropping System Areas | |
| 8. |
Integrated Cereal Development Programmes in Coarse Cereals Based Cropping System Areas |
|
| 9. | Special Jute Development Programme | |
| 10. | Sustainable Development of Sugarcane Based Cropping System | |
| 11. | Balanced & Integrated Use of Fertilizer | |
| 12. | Promotion of Agricultural Mechanization among Small Farmers | |
| 13. | Integrated Development of Tropical, Arid & Temperate Zone Fruits | |
| 14. | Production and Supply of Vegetable Seeds | |
| 15. | Development of Commercial Floriculture | |
| 16. | Development of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants | |
| 17. | Development of Roots and Tuber Crops | |
| 18. | Development of Cocoa and Cashew | |
| 19. | Integrated Programme for Development of Spices | |
| 20. | Development of Mushroom | |
| 21. | Use of Plastics in Agriculture | |
| 22. | Bee-Keeping | |
| 23. | National Watershed Development Project for Rainfed Areas | |
| 24. | Scheme for Foundation & Certified Seed Production of Vegetable Crops | |
| 25. | Soil Conservation in Catchments of River Valley Projects & Flood Prone Rivers | |
| 26. | Reclamation & Development of Alkali Soils | |
| 27. | State Land Use Board |
Annexure-II
DECISIONS OF GOVERNMENT ON THE SCHEME – MACRO MANAGEMENT OF AGRICULTURE
The work plan would indicate the physical
targets and the benefit stream in terms of area, production level,
productivity etc.
The outlay of the Work Plan would be shared by
the Centre and the States in the ratio of 90: 10 respectively. In the case
of North-Eastern States, however, the entire expenditure will be borne by
Government of India.
The Central assistance to the States for the
Work Plan will be in the ration of 80% Grant and 20% Loan.
New initiative by State Government will be
governed will be governed by the following criteria :-
- It would not be covered under any other approved Scheme of Central Government.
- It would not be part of the any on-on-going State Scheme.
- Expenditure on new
initiative would not be more than 10 % of the allocation to a State under the
Scheme of Macro Management.
There should be cap on subsidy to farmers
incorporated in the Work Plans. Subsidy per farmer or per activity should not
exceed 25 % of the cost or the present subsidy level approved under 27
identified schemes, which ever is lower. However, considering the difficulty
in operationalising this decision in the middle of the Plan period, it may be
brought into effect from the 10th Plan
While the Union Department of Agriculture &
Cooperation would have flexibility for reallocation, expenditure under the
individual component would not be in excess of 20% of what has been incurred
in the last year.
Creation of posts and purchase of new staff vehicles should not be included in the Work Plans.
GUIDELINES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF MACRO MANAGEMENT SCHEME
The permissible carry over of
unspent balance in the first year of operation would be 25% of the annual
allocation. This permissible carry over would be reduced by 5% every year so
that the permissible carry over is brought down to 10% of annual allocation
over a period of 4 years.
50% of the annual allocation would
be released as first installment of a financial year.
The release of second and final
installment would be considered on the fulfillment of the following
conditions.
(i) Utilization Certificate for the funds released up to the previous financial year.
(ii) Expenditure of at least 60% of available funds i.e. unspent balance of the previous year plus the releases in the first installment.
(iii) Full release of the corresponding share of the
State Government.
The second release would be made
during the period from October to March. The request for second installment
may be made by the implementing agencies (States/UTs) by October. Releases
would be made on graded basis depending on the time of reporting utlization as
also the receipt of complete proposal for second installment. The graded
release would be on principles as indicated below :-
Proposals received in :
October to December - 50% of allocated funds
January - 40% of allocated funds
February - 30% of allocated funds
March - 20% of allocated funds
Any excess over the permissible limit of 25% carry over will be adjusted in the 2nd installment.
GUIDELINES FOR THE STATES MACRO MANAGEMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Macro Management Mode is a major step towards achieving decentralization in pursuance of restoring primacy of the States in agricultural development planning. Under the Scheme for Macro Management of Agriculture, the States have the freedom to develop and pursue activities on the basis of their regional priorities through the Work Plans.
Work Plans
The States will prepare their Work Plans in consultation with the Subject-Matter-Division in the Deptt. Of Agriculture & Cooperation Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India.
New Interventions
Where necessary, new
interventions proposed by the States are also considered for inclusion the
Work Plans provided:
i) It is not covered under any other approved scheme of
Central Government or is not apart of any on-
going State scheme.
ii) The expenditure on the new initiative would not be more than 10% of
the total allocation to the State
under the macro
Management Scheme.
Subsidy
Subsidy payable under the Work Plan should not exceed the present subsidy level approved under 27 CSS subsumed into Macro Management Mode.
Release of Central assistance
The Central assistance to the States/UTs will be released as per approved guidelines by the Ministry Ministry of Finance and will be routed through the State Agriculture Deptt. Which is the Nodal Deptt. under the Scheme. The State Agriculture Deptt. Which is the Nodal Deptt. under the Scheme. The State Agriculture Deptt. Will make further allocations to the Implementing Deptts. Etc in their State. In order to ensure that funds are released by the State Agriculture Deptt. to other participating agencies without delay, the order re-allocating the funds should clearly indicate the quantum of funds earmarked for each implementing agency. To facilitate coordination among the various implementing agencies, the Standing Committee set up under APC/Chief Secretary for this purpose should be activated.
For effective implementation of the Scheme, timely release of funds is necessary. It shall, therefore, be attempted to release the first instt. of funds during April each year. In order to release the first instt. i.e. 50% of the annual allocations under the Scheme during April, the Deptt. of Agriculture & Cooperation propose to make suitable provisions in its “Vote of Account” in the future. It is, therefore, necessary that the States take immediate action for further allocation of funds to the various Implementation Agencies, after the release of 1st instt. of Central assistance.
Utilization of Central assistance
The second
installment would be released on a graded basis depending upon 60% utilization
of available funds (unspent balance of the last year plus the releases in the
first installment) as indicated below:
Proposal received in:
October to December - 50% of allocated funds
January - 40 % of allocated funds
February - 30 % of allocated funds
March -
20 % of allocated funds
The release of second installment would also depend upon furnishing utilization certificate for the funds released upto the previous financial year. Full release of the corresponding share of the State Government, would also be required.
States should ensure that the Central assistance released under the Scheme is utilized in accordance with the approved Work Plan for the year. Since the amount of the second & final installment of Central assistance will depend on the progress of utilization of funds by the States, the State should ensure that the funds released are utilized promptly and “Progress Reports” sent to the Deptt. of Agriculture & Cooperation at the earliest. It may be pertinent to mention here that the performance of the States/UTs will be reflected in the performance Budget document of this Ministry. The non-utilization of Central assistance will hinder further release of funds, as the cap on the permissible carryover of funds which will be applied from 2001-02 onwards, will be enforceable
6. The permissible carry over of unspent balance would be 25% of the annual allocation during current financial year, i.e., 2001-02. This permissible carry over limit would be reduced by 5% every year so that the cap is brought down to 10% of annual allocation over a period of 4 years. Any excess over the permissible carry over limit would be adjusted in the second installment.
Special Component Plan (SCP) and tribal sub Plan (TSP)
As per guidelines of the Planning Commission, each State is required to formulate Special Component Plan/Tribal Sub Plan by earmarking a portion of Plan funds for utilization on schemes meant for welfare of Scheduled Castes/Tribes. The States should ensure compliance of those instructions and furnish the details of the interventions likely to benefit the SC/ST community, included in their Work plans.
Monitoring of the progress of the Scheme
The responsibility for monitoring progress of activities under the Work Plan rests with the concerned Subject Matter Divisions in this Ministry.
Formulation of proposals for the Xth Five Year Plan
States may ensure submission of their proposals for X Five Year Plan and for the year 2002-03 at the earliest. The programmes/schemes for Tenth Plan are to be formulated keeping in mind the implementation of National Agricultural Policy and Action Plan for doubling food production. Tentatively, the outlay for the Work Plan for 2002-03 may be fixed at twice the provision available for 2001-02. The size of the Tenth Plan may be taken as five and one half times that of the Annual Plan of 2002-03. Proportionate revision will be effected when actual out-lay for Tenth Plan is known.
In view of the priority accorded by the Government of India to Natural Resources Management and to horticulture development, it is felt that Work Plan of the State must reflect the critical significance of these sectors. Accordingly, it may be ensured that the proportionate allocation in the Work Plan for natural resource management (NWDPRA, RVP & FPR, etc) and horticulture is not less that the average proportion of funds released under the corresponding schemes to the total releases under the 27 erstwhile Centrally Sponsored Schemes during the Ninth Plan period as a whole (including the allocations made under Macro Management mode in 2000-01 and 2001-02
Annexure-V
Allocation for 2004-05 and release of 1st instt.
(Rs. in crores)
|
S.No. |
States/UTs |
Allocation (Central share) |
Amount of Central assistance released |
|
1. |
ANDHRA PRADESH |
36.00 |
18.00 |
|
2. |
ARUNACHAL PRADESH |
5.00 |
2.50 |
|
3. |
ASSAM |
8.00 |
4.00 |
|
4. |
BIHAR |
18.00 |
7.20 |
|
5. |
CHHATTISGARH |
18.00 |
9.00 |
|
6. |
GOA |
2.00 |
1.00 |
|
7. |
GUJARAT |
23.00 |
11.50 |
|
8. |
HARYANA |
16.00 |
8.00 |
|
9. |
HIMACHAL PRADESH |
16.00 |
8.00 |
|
10. |
JAMMU & KASHMIR |
16.00 |
8.00 |
|
11. |
JHARKHAND |
14.00 |
7.00 |
|
12. |
KARNATAKA |
57.00 |
28.50 |
|
13. |
KERALA |
29.00 |
14.50 |
|
14. |
MADHYA PRADESH |
45.00 |
22.50 |
|
15. |
MAHARASHTRA |
82.00 |
41.00 |
|
16. |
MANIPUR |
7.00 |
3.50 |
|
17. |
MIZORAM |
9.00 |
4.50 |
|
18. |
MEGHALAYA |
7.00 |
3.50 |
|
19. |
NAGALAND |
9.00 |
4.50 |
|
20. |
ORISSA |
23.00 |
11.50 |
|
21. |
PUNJAB |
15.00 |
|
|
22. |
RAJASTHAN |
68.00 |
31.25 |
|
23. |
SIKKIM |
6.00 |
3.00 |
|
24. |
TAMIL NADU |
43.00 |
20.05 |
|
25. |
TRIPURA |
8.00 |
4.00 |
|
26. |
UTTAR PRADESH |
70.00 |
32.05 |
|
27. |
UTTARANCHAL |
16.00 |
7.19 |
|
28. |
WEST BENGAL |
24.00 |
12.00 |
|
29. |
DELHI |
1.00 |
|
|
30. |
PONDICHERRY |
1.00 |
0.50 |
|
31. |
A&N ISLANDS |
1.00 |
0.50 |
|
32. |
CHANDIGARH |
0.25 |
|
|
33. |
DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI |
0.50 |
|
|
34. |
DAMAN & DIU |
0.25 |
|
|
35. |
LAKSHADWEEP |
1.00 |
|
|
|
TOTAL |
695.00 |
328.74 |
PHYSICAL AND FINANCIAL TARGETS AND ACHIEVEMENTS
(Rs. In lakhs)
| S.No. | Name of Scheme | Components of the Scheme | Unit | Target | Achievements | ||
| Phy. | Fin. | Phy. | Fin. | ||||
| 1. | Strengthening of training institutes |
Expansion of existing building, training hall, hostel and purchase of instruments etc. of
1. Apex institute 2. Satellite institutes |
Training courses
|
||||
| 2. | Training support for Agri. Extension Activities |
1. Human Resource Development Programme
(a) trainings. Total |
Nos. |
||||
| 3. | Mobility of extension machinery | Vehicle repairs, P.O.L., supply of materials & hiring of vehicles. | Nos. | ||||
| 4. | Study tours/farmers exchange programme |
Organisation of study tours 1. Within State Total |
Group of 50 farmers |
||||
| 5. | Extension through Agrl. Exhibition |
1. Organisation of
exhibition & production of exhibites etc.
2.
Preparation of exhibits at Total |
Amount per unit | ||||
| 6. |
|
1. No. of samples to be tested | No. | ||||
|
2. Bioagents
Total |
Cards M.T. Lit. Egg. Units |
|||||
| 7. | Establishment & strengthening of agro polyclinics |
|
As per Requirement & project cost of infrastructure |
||||
| 8. | Strengthening of seed farms |
|
No. No. No. |
||||
| 9. | Development of cereal crops |
Total: |
|||||
| 9b. | Development of sugarcane |
1. Field
demonstration 2. Seed multiplication a. Breeders seed b. Foundation seed c. Certified seed 3. Human
resource a. Farmers training b. Field visit 4. Land
Development a. Green manuring b. Insitu trash manuring 5. Agriculture implements 6. Contingency Total: |
|||||
| 10. | Development of sugarcane in low productivity areas |
1. Field
demonstration 2. Seed multiplication a. Breeder seed b. Foundation seed c. Certified seed 3. Human resource a. Staff training b. Farmers training c. Field Visit 4. Land Development a. Green manuring b. Insitu trash manuring c. Gypsum supply 5. Agriculture implements 6. Contingency Total: |
|||||
| 11. | Use of information technology in agriculture |
Total: |
No. | ||||
| 12. |
INPUT Assistance for breeder seed purchase, foundation seed production & certified seed distribution & storage for cereal crops |
Total |
Qtls |
||||
| 13. | Seed production programme in selected villages | Seed production programme of improved seeds of varieties of paddy, wheat & minor millets. | |||||
| 14. | Hybrid and basmati rice development programme |
Total |
|||||
| 15. | Opening of fertilizer distribution centers in Hilly, Remote and inaccessible areas |
Opening of fertilizer distribution centers in Hilly, Remote and inaccessible areas |
|||||
| 16. |
Setting up of germ compost production programme units |
Setting up of vermin compost production units | |||||
| 17. | Production of bio pesticides | To promote efforts of production of bio-pesticides in the State | |||||
| 18. | Agriculture mechanization |
|
|||||
| 19. | Participation of private sectors in extension/information/soil testing/micro nutrient testing |
|
No. | ||||
| 20. | National watershed development Programme |
Management Component
Development component
b. Non arable lands
Run off managements structures
Water Harvesting structures
Conservation and development of bio-mass
Others
c. Drainage Lines Upper reaches
|
No. | ||||
| 21. | River Valley project |
Total |
Ha./No Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. Rs. |
||||
| 22. | Strengthening of state land use board |
Seminars
Conferences
Publication material |
|||||
| 23. |
MICRO IRRIGATION Spread of drip/sprinkler irrigation & green house technology |
Total |
Ha No Ha No. No. No. |
||||
| 24. |
HORTICULTURE Development of cashew |
Total |
No. Ha No. Ha No |
||||
| 25. | Development of fruits |
Total |
No. Ha. No. No. No. No. No. Ha. No. No. No. Ha. No. |
||||
| 26. | Development of floriculture |
Total |
No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. |
||||
| 27. | Development of Mushroom |
Total |
No. No. |
||||
| 28. | Development of Spices |
Total |
No. Ha.
M.T.
No. No. |
||||
| 29. | Development of Medicinal & Aromatic Plants |
Total |
No.
No. No. No. No. No. |
||||
| 30. | Development of tea & coffee | Area expansion | No. | ||||
| 31. | Development of vegetable |
Total |
Qtl. Ha. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. No. |
||||
| 32. | Development of nurseries |
Total |
No. No. No. No. No. No. |
||||
| 33. | Agriculture Marketing | ||||||
| 34. | Assistance preparation of feasibility project report | Assistance for preparation of feasibility project report | No. | ||||
| 35. | Assistance for establishment of common facilities center for value addition to fruit and vegetable crops | Assistance for establishment of common facilities center for value addition to fruit and vegetable crops | No. | ||||
| 36. | Incentives on experimental consignment for export | Incentives on experimental consignment for export | No. | ||||
| 37. | Assistance for participation in exhibition by entrepreneur officers | Assistance for participation in international exhibition by entrepreneur officers | No. | ||||
| 38. | Assistance for establishment of marketing information center | Assistance for establishment of marketing information center | No. | ||||
| 39. | Assistance for opening of the retail outlet (market support for fruits and vegetables) | Assistance for opening of the retail outlet (market support for fruits and vegetables) | No. | ||||
| 40. | Assistance for establishment of residue testing lab. | Assistance for establishment of residue testing lab. | no. of samples | ||||
| 41. | Assistance for establishment of food park | Assistance for establishment of food park | No. | ||||
| 42. |
Assistance for
establishment of basmati rice
Interventions in view of W.T.O. regime |
Assistance for
establishment of basmati rice
Total |
No. |
||||
Annexure - VII
FORM GFR 19-A
(See Government of India’s Decision (1) below Rule 150)
Form of Utilization Certificate
| S.No. | Letter No. & Date | Amount |
Certified that out of Rs. ……………….of Grants-in-aid sanctioned during the year ……………in favour of ………… … ………….. under this Ministry/Department Letter No. given in the margin and Rs……………. on account of unspent balance of the previous year, a sum of Rs. ………….has been utilized for the purpose of …………………….for which it was sanctioned and that the balance of Rs……………remaining unutilized at the end of the year has been surrendered to Government (vide No…………dated ……………..)/will be adjusted towards the grants-in-aid payable during the next year……………
|
Certified that I have satisfied myself that the conditions on which the grants-in-aid was sanctioned have been duly fulfilled/are being fulfilled and that I have exercised the following checks to see that the money was actually utilized for the purpose for which it was sanctioned.
Kinds of checks exercised
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Signature......................................................
Designation..................................................
Date..............................................................
[G.I., M.F., O.M. No. F. 14 (1)-E-II
(A)/73, dated
[Stop Press]
[Announcements]
[Feedback]
[Help Desk]